<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Existence of Spirits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/</link>
	<description>In the silence of the wild, we find the home we lost in the city. --John Muir</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: therioshamanism</title>
		<link>http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therioshamanism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t yet read that book, though I do now have a copy on hand. I did, however, get some good derivative information from George Leonard&#039;s &quot;The Silent Pulse&quot;. I figure somewhere in all this mess of conflicting opinions there&#039;s got to be some way to make it all fit together in a multi-layered manner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t yet read that book, though I do now have a copy on hand. I did, however, get some good derivative information from George Leonard&#8217;s &#8220;The Silent Pulse&#8221;. I figure somewhere in all this mess of conflicting opinions there&#8217;s got to be some way to make it all fit together in a multi-layered manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awarewolf</title>
		<link>http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Awarewolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therioshamanism.com/2007/12/05/the-existence-of-spirits/#comment-140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting to see someone else caught in that web of social/internal dogma that&#039;s been built up around us Westerners.  It&#039;s all &quot;science&quot; and &quot;cold hard facts&quot; - there are days when I fall into these deep existential crises that focus on a thought pattern of, &quot;regardless of what I&#039;m doing or feeling, it can all be boiled down to chemical interactions within my biology or the atomic structure of the universe,&quot; thus rendering a simple great mood into an over-complicated and unpleasing mess.

On the other hand, The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot, brings some positive perspective into this dilemma that faces many of us caught in our pop-culture purgatory.  Perhaps those things that we want to perceive as &quot;objective&quot; (and the rest of society tells us is &quot;internal&quot;) become objective through our own internal belief.  Is it possible for something (matter, spirit, emotion) to become objective only after rising from an internal process?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see someone else caught in that web of social/internal dogma that&#8217;s been built up around us Westerners.  It&#8217;s all &#8220;science&#8221; and &#8220;cold hard facts&#8221; &#8211; there are days when I fall into these deep existential crises that focus on a thought pattern of, &#8220;regardless of what I&#8217;m doing or feeling, it can all be boiled down to chemical interactions within my biology or the atomic structure of the universe,&#8221; thus rendering a simple great mood into an over-complicated and unpleasing mess.</p>
<p>On the other hand, The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot, brings some positive perspective into this dilemma that faces many of us caught in our pop-culture purgatory.  Perhaps those things that we want to perceive as &#8220;objective&#8221; (and the rest of society tells us is &#8220;internal&#8221;) become objective through our own internal belief.  Is it possible for something (matter, spirit, emotion) to become objective only after rising from an internal process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

